Activist
Post
For a people to be free, they must first be honest with themselves, their
government, and the world at large. History is filled with stories of
free nations that fell under the spell cast by their governments who exploited
the threat of terror.
In fact, numerous presidents in American history already have used various
specific threats to sidestep their Constitutional restraints. Today we
are entering a nebulous world where our "enemy" cannot be defined,
has no particular allegiance to one country, and is able to adopt new leaders
at will. Rather than encourage a sense of resilience and independence in
its citizens, America has chosen to amplify the terror threat in order to
concentrate power in the hands of the State. The very first signpost on
this historically familiar road to tyranny is an atmosphere of hate,
suspicion, and vindictiveness. It first begins as an outwardly directed
aggression and then rather abruptly turns inward upon itself.
The good news is that freedom is won and lost in our hearts and minds. It
is for this reason that we must state the obvious: we have clearly passed
through the first "atmospheric" stage of approaching dictatorship,
and have now entered the second -- the open behavior of a dictatorship
in the United States.
It will never
be announced
on the evening news, and it is not likely to continue under an authoritarian
leader in the mold of a Stalin, Hitler, or Mao. Likewise, it is not to say
that Barack Obama is the first dictator of The United States, but rather is
part of a continued expansion of executive power that is now so great that by
all measures America can no longer be called a Land of the Free ruled by We the
People. We stand no chance of reversing this forced march by false
democracy until we understand where we are headed, who is leading us there, and
for what purpose.
1. Rule by
force, not by
law: This is where it all begins; when the legal framework that serves to
define a country and its behavior is dismantled and intimidation
tactics take over. In the most extreme case, drone bombings and
assassinations have begun of non-citizens, as well as U.S.
citizens, leading only to a debate over whether U.S. citizens should be
stripped
of citizenship before assassination. Governmental assassinations
are in complete opposition to the laws
of America and all international laws and agreements. In the last
week we have also seen the official
elimination of the 4th Amendment in Indiana, which is a clear precedent-setting
ruling to say that the State now believes that it owns the property and person
of its citizens. As a result, the militarized
police have been granted unlimited access, which will only cause an
escalation in cases of police brutality and misconduct. This is yet
another addition to the precedent set by TSA
groping and sexual harassment in airports, Child Protective Services kidnapping
children of activists in pro-liberty causes, public school surveillance,
and the lawless detention of activists who videotape
the police. All areas of society are now ruled top-down through
state legislation adopted to justify federal grants that have installed a
police state apparatus in America. And these federal agencies such as the
TSA actually believe they
rule supreme over the states. We now live in a country where CIA
abductions, overseas detention, torture and assassinations can be carried out
against anyone without
due process and without recourse if later cleared; in fact, the Supreme
Court has just ended
the legal debate by refusing to even consider appeals.
Consequently, an atmosphere has been created where the government is permitted
to break countless laws, like warrantless GPS tracking of
activists by the FBI, while average citizens are guilty of pre-crimes.
The increase in executive power under the aegis of National Security is
our greatest threat and has led to all that follows.
2. Crushing
peaceful
protest: Despite the current
mission to defend protesters living in dictatorships overseas, when
George Bush brought "free speech zones" to America it effectively
spelled the end of peaceful, lawful street protest. Now the full force of
brutality and surveillance has been unleashed upon the very people intent in
stopping it through peaceful means. It is as sure a sign as any about
totalitarian intentions, when anti-war
activists have become one of the targets. The activist is
beginning to equal terrorist in the all-seeing eye of the State, and any street
gathering is a sure sign to let loose all of the riot weapons that were
formerly used against insurgents on foreign battlefields. One look at the
G20
protest in Pittsburgh, a recent Illinois
University event, and the ongoing travesty of the torture
and incarceration of Bradley Manning, and we can begin to see through
the propaganda of White House officials when they talk about terrible dictators
in other nations crushing dissent.
3. Checkpoints: The slow acclimation of the populace to military-style
checkpoints began first as border
control operations up to 100 miles inland in what the ACLU calls the Constitution
Free Zone. However, this has rather quickly morphed into local
traffic stops across the country for "unsavory" characters such as
those targeted by the Amber Alert system and DUI checkpoints. Though
apparently well meaning, we are now far beyond even loosely suspected criminal
activity, as VIPR
teams have been introduced to take
over public transportation and events. The TSA tyranny has hit
the streets of America, now forming a de facto internal passport system
straight out of the totalitarian playbook. The expanding checkpoint
system dovetails with new initiatives such as the No
Ride List proposal of Chuck Shumer, building upon the No Fly List
already in place. These no-travel lists are extrajudicial, secret, and
form a guilty-until-proven innocent framework that subverts freedom instead of
protecting it. Incidentally, this element of constant suspicion is
exactly what leads to a citizen spy network.
4. Citizen
spy network:
Dictatorships know how difficult it is to rule over large populations with only
the relatively small numbers of military and police. Despite the lessons of
terror created by citizen surveillance that the
East German Stasi files left us to examine, just such a network has
been openly introduced to present-day America -- and now it's even more
high-tech and populated.
Secret black budget projects organized through the NSA like Perfect
Citizen is just one among many. Our head of Homeland Security,
Janet Napolitano -- in partnership with retailer Wal-Mart
-- kicked off the See
Something, Say Something program, which goes beyond the already
high-tech surveillance apparatus of the NSA and turns each of us into an unpaid
employee of the police state. Similarly, the web of cameras and data
mining is far too massive for even the well-funded NSA, but with gadgets at our
disposal we can now download
apps to enable spying on our neighbors. Most dangerous of all,
though, is new legislation introduced by Peter King that enshrines Janet
Napolitano's program and would provide
immunity for accusers "acting in good faith" while reporting
suspicious activities. This is guaranteed to lead to false arrests and
disappearances, just as it has on every occasion throughout history when a
society's fear becomes self-directed.
5. Executive Orders: This is the means by which a dictator can
come to power in the United States, despite a framework of checks and
balances. Any time a country has centralized its power to the executive
branch by erasing the checks and balances of separate legislative and judicial
bodies, the result has been dictatorship. And this normally happens when
national security is “threatened.” The Constitution is clear, however:
only the legislature (Congress) can make laws. Yet, the use of Executive
Orders has increased, beginning with President Clinton who came under fire for
his abuse of this power, becoming one of only two presidents (the other was
Truman’s E.O. 12954) to have an Executive Order struck down by the
courts. His successors seem only to have been
encouraged. Clinton issued 14, George W. issued over 60, and Obama is
at 26 with many more to be expected if he wins a second term. Among the most
egregious of Obama's orders is the ability to
hold detainees indefinitely even after a court has found them not
guilty. Executive Orders also form the basis for control over regulatory
agencies, which then impose the directives. While it seems multi-layered
with potential checks and balances, all directives can now be issued top-down
in dictatorial fashion.
6. Control
of regulatory
agencies: This is the more insidious and, ultimately, dangerous tactic used
by dictatorships. Dictatorship through regulation invades every
facet of society without relying only upon overt violence. As
mentioned above, only the legislature can make laws. However, the
legislature has created “regulatory bodies” which make de facto laws
through “violations” that rob us of freedom. There is no clearer example
at the moment than the FDA, which has brought in near-total food
control. The FDA is working in concert with a global agenda being
foisted upon us through the Codex
Alimentarius commission in Europe which essentially renders anything
healthy as toxic, and all that is toxic as healthy. Regulatory
agencies in the United States have engendered a system where the corporate-government
revolving door leads to corruption and consolidation -- not free markets.
The current regulations are opposed to the principles of freedom and
independence, and favor only those in positions to make money from more
control; so more control and less freedom is what we can expect under these
federal directives controlling the states.
7. President declares war unilaterally: Despite the parade of lies
that led to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, it pales in comparison with the new
war in Libya and other interventions and sanctions throughout the Middle East and
North Africa. Through Executive Orders, outlined above, the President can
declare war so long as there is a resolution passed by Congress. This has
been dispensed with through Obama's
illegal wars, and it appears that Congress could go even further by
ceding its power completely to the president. The disregard for
Congressional approval is already dictatorial, but if this last step is taken
we will effectively be living in a permanent
state of war tantamount to WWIII that will be controlled at the sole
discretion of the current and future presidents. This unilateral power to
drag nations into war without checks and balances is a hallmark of
dictatorships where entire countries are swept along purely by the ideology of
their leader. As Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell have
stated, "We have a dictatorship when it comes to foreign
policy." With the latest development, it is actually a dictatorship
when it comes to domestic
policy as well, since America's espionage network has turned inward,
and this new presidential power would not be limited to overseas actions.
8. Torture: Torture has long been a tactic used
by America. In fact it runs the leading school on its methods. The School
of the Americas (now called WHINSEC) has been responsible for training
Latin American dictators and their thugs on how to intimidate the local
population and rule with an iron fist. However, the torture debate has hit mainstream media in
a serious discussion about its effectiveness, especially following the
assassination of Osama bin Laden. Aside from the despicable morals
involved, torture
doesn't work for intelligence gathering, according to experts.
Furthermore, the legalization of torture was what really brought the dreaded Russian
secret police out into the open. When such a declaration is made,
it is literally a recruiting strategy to find the criminals and sadists who
would love to be part of such a system. Torture is not normal work for
normal people; it is the work of psychopaths such as Dick
Cheney who loves the tactic of waterboarding so much that he has stated
it should be brought back and used more widely. No nation that uses
torture to obtain confessions can be called legitimate. It is only used as a
tool of intimidation and oppression by totalitarian regimes.
9. Forced labor camps (gulags): This is when we know that a totalitarian
society has arrived in full and our society is run completely by
coercion. As Naomi Wolf
has illustrated, "With its jails in Iraq and Afghanistan, and, of course,
Guantánamo in Cuba, where detainees are abused, and kept indefinitely without trial
and without access to the due process of the law, America certainly has its
gulag now." Additionally, a silent gulag has already been created
inside America, starting with the nation's prisoners who are increasingly
locked up within a for-profit
prison-industrial system that makes money both on the construction
of prisons as well as the cheap
labor force. The Defense Department itself pays prisoners 23
cents per hour to build its weapons systems, which is clearly a type of slave
labor. One might immediately argue that there is a huge difference
between real prisoners and innocent people swept off the streets as they were
in Stalinist Russia, for example, or in modern day North Korea and China.
That is to presume, however, that everyone in prison is guilty; and, if they
are, that the crimes which have sent them there really constitute offenses
worthy of prison sentences. America has the world's
largest prison population and the highest
incarceration rate precisely because nearly everything is a jail-time
crime, and there is money to be made by the growing corporate prison
system. The War on Drugs alone has led to a disproportionate number of
inmates for non-violent offenses among the already 2.4 million in jail and the
5 million on probation. With the economy imploding, even debtors
prisons have made a comeback. Although FEMA camps are still relegated to fringe conspiracy
theory, we should be wary of the potential endgame for such a proven
system of oppression. Through Continuity of
Government, national emergency directives would openly suspend the
Constitution and could possibly lead once
again to internment camps in America.
10. Control
over all
communications (propaganda): Once the physical framework of
dictatorial control has been set up, then the justification for its continued
presence can commence. The type of high-tech control grid now put into
place in The United States to this point has only been explored in works of
fiction such as 1984, which has led Paul
Craig Roberts to draw a correct parallel. A public emergency
announcement system has in fact been in place since the '50s, whereby the
president can interrupt television and radio to deliver critical
messages. However, this has been recently expanded even beyond the Telecommunications Act of 1996
as the FCC
voted to mandate (PDF) "the first-ever Presidential alert to be
aired across the United States on the Nation’s Emergency Alert System
(EAS).” Now, with the arrival of the trackable smartphone that can
be hijacked to bring government messages (emergency or not) we find
ourselves "willing" participants in a scenario reaching far beyond 1984.
Using the bin Laden assassination and the threat of guaranteed reprisal, the
government has announced that the president will break into these private
networks to carry PLAN
government messages and warnings; and there is no opt-out. This is
slated to go even further, as Infowars has
reported: "All smart devices have federally-mandated control and
kill switches added. This will give the government total control over incoming
information to all smart phones regardless of manufacturer. These policies
dovetail with the roll out of Smart Meters and the new Google controlled smart
homes which will send messages over the power-lines to your appliances to
control power consumption or simply cut the power. In addition, new 'green'
lighting systems are being installed in government buildings which send and
receive data through controlled pulses of light. And now the Pentagon wants the
authority to run it all." At the same time, we have seen the buildup in
rhetoric leading toward Internet
control. As always, an unsavory element of society (pirating) has
been used as one of the pretexts to introduce government control over private
industry, while cybersecurity lays claim to total control over the
infrastructure for national emergencies. Ideologically, Obama advisor,
Cass Sunstein, has proposed a fairness
doctrine for the Internet that would enable a government overlay on
private websites that would offer counter opinions to anti-establishment
content. We are approaching a situation worse
than China, where both mental intrusion via propaganda and physical
intrusion via systems control are merging. It is not comforting to know,
also, that the president made a shocking claim recently that he
can censor unclassified documents. There is clearly a concerted
effort to take over all forms of information, permitting the government to
alter it or censor it before consumption by its citizens. In any other
country we would call this a dictatorship.
It would appear that the United States should be a called a dictatorship based
on the above criteria. Once the atmosphere is established, average participants
need not be part of a conspiracy, as they tend to unquestioningly go with the
flow. However, we must acknowledge that the U.S. is in a vastly different
position than totalitarian regimes of the past, as well as her contemporaries.
America has a history that is built upon the foundation of resistance to
dictators. This memory needs to be invoked by following the protections
outlined in our founding documents, particularly the power of the states to
resist Federal tyranny. The protections therein can be restored once we
have the courage to admit how much freedom we have lost, then refuse to succumb
to a fear-based perception of reality. Only then will Liberty, Love and
Peace prevail!
|