Government, Presidency, Congress, Courts
Home | Big Business' Vision of Their Future | Supreme Court to Overturn Abortions | How Congress Works | Lesson from HOW CONGRESS WORKS--jk | The Most Powerful Lobby | RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA MACHINE, Brock's book | The Republican Noise Machine, commentary thereon--jk | American Democracy--Jim Hightower | The Power to Kill: Corporate Rights | Business Before Environment--Al Franken | WAR ON DRUGS: COSTS--JK | Evolution of governments--jk | Reagan meets the reaper | Fractured Service | FDA blood donation bans--conservative BS | Social Security Privitization--a gift to Wall Street | Neoliberal Mismanagement of the Gov. Bureaucracy | SEND THEM BACK | SATIRE ON PRISON LIFE--JK | STATS ON WORLD POVERTY
Supreme Court to Overturn Abortions

The writing is on the wall, the Republicans and Democrats have confirmed (Jan. 06) an anti-abortion justice—the swing vote.


U.S. nears ending abortion rights for women.

The Guardian UK, Feb. 2/06

Article at,,1700001,00.html



US supreme court nears crucial abortion ruling

Suzanne Goldenberg in

Thursday February 2, 2006

The US supreme court moved a step closer yesterday to taking up its first case on abortion since the appointment of two judges of President George Bush's choosing, after two federal appeals courts ruled that a ban on a termination procedure was unconstitutional.  The rulings, in courts in California and New York, were handed down on Tuesday, the same day that the deeply conservative Samuel Alito was sworn in as a supreme court justice, and underlined how quickly his appointment could change federal abortion law. This is likely to be the next abortion case before the court and probably the first one Alito will hear," said Lorraine Kenny, a spokeswoman for the American Civil Liberties Union, which fought the case in New York. "We are concerned."   Both rulings said the ban on the procedure, which involves partly removing an intact foetus from the body after the first trimester before aborting it, was unconstitutional because it failed to provide an exception when alternative methods could endanger the woman's health.


The ban, which was signed into law by President Bush in 2003 but never enforced because of legal challenges, would make what the anti-abortion movement calls partial birth abortion punishable by up to two years' jail for doctors who carry it out.


In a unanimous ruling, the court in San Francisco said the law placed an unfair burden on a woman's right to an abortion, and put doctors at risk of criminal liability for virtually all abortion procedures after the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. The ruling from the New York court was less of a victory for the abortion rights movement, with an unusually sharp dissent from one judge and a rebuke from the chief judge, John Walker. Mr Walker overturned the ban, but called the abortion procedure "morally repugnant". He called on the supreme court to issue a ruling that would require opponents of the ban to demonstrate how it would harm women.  


The twin rulings make it increasingly likely that the federal ban on the procedure would be the next abortion case before the US supreme court, and the first that Justice Alito will hear. The issue is already before the supreme court after a court in Missouri became the first to strike down the ban by Congress last year.


Enter supporting content here