Home | Who Was Jesus Christ--Charlesk Badluah, 1860 | A Few Words about the Devil | Ancient Hebrew (Talmud) account of Christ--McKinsey | A review of references to Christ outside the Bible | EBIONITES--EARLY JEWISH CHRISTIANS | SEPTUAGINT BIBLE & the transmission of the Old Testament | 194 Contradictions New Testament | 62 Contradictions Old & New Testaments | 101 Contradictions Old Testament | CONTRADICTIONS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT | MARIJUANA AND THE BIBLE--Zion Coptic Church | Q, a product of Christian fantasy--jk | Sermon On the Mount--contradictions | Interpolation in Josephus on Jesus | Christian Treatment of Women | New Testament Supports Socialism

Q, a product of Christian fantasy--jk

Email to Louis Cable explaining some of the problems with
supposing that there was an earlier work of sayings--now lost.
Louis Cable is author of Condractions in the New Testament and Sermon on the Mount--contradictions

Your acceptance of Q surprises me.  IT reminds me of when a synod met over a century after Mohammed’s death for to determine which were the spurious and which weren’t of the several stories told about him.  With such much written and little if anything known of their sources the determination was little more than divination with the belief of the group being the deciding factor. I believe the same has occurred with Q.  And while the collection has a certain ring of being reasonable to the more enlightened Christians, this is a mere reflection of the expectation of biblical scholars who sat and judge.  Moreover, they came to the table clouded with faith in Christ and a Christian creed.  A group of non-Christian scholars would be a better judge, or better yet agnostics and atheists.   

          But there is yet another reason not to believe in Q.  First, Paul and the other authors of the Epistle not only did not know of the Gospel fictions, they did not know of Christ’s teachings.  And being before Mark, and presumable after Q, their silence is extremely problematic. Paul traveled widely, and communicated with the Consol in Jerusalem, yet he knew not Q.  Paul declares his ignorance in I Corinthians, chapter 1, verse 17ff.  A number of my essays address these problems:  especially,, which deals with all the reasons for assuming the Gospels are fictions; and which is on sources of the Jesus Legend.  And as for Pagan parallels (which you close with in the discussion of Q) try by Kerry Temple, Editor of Notre Dame Magazine.  Given all this and that the claims concerning Q are not made by independent scholars, but by Christians, I must reject, until better evidence presented in support of the hypothetical Q.  

          I hope that you find things on my sites that are of use.  Your comments would be more than welcomed.  I am interested in how to become better placed in the search engines.  I have been using the links Tripod provides. But with so many articles, this is tedious.  My email address is * 

Enter supporting content here