In the wee hours of the morning on August
                           8, 1983, while I was traveling along a lonely rural highway approaching Haigler, Neb., a large craft with bright lights overtook me and forced me to the side of the road. Alien beings exited the craft
                           and abducted me for 90 minutes, after which time I found myself back on the road with no memory of what transpired inside
                           the ship. I can prove that this happened because I recounted it to a film crew shortly afterward.
                            
                           When alien abductees recount to me their stories, I do not deny that they had a real
                           experience. But thanks to recent research by Harvard University psychologists Richard
                           J. Mc-Nally and Susan A. Clancy, we now know that some fantasies are indistinguishable from reality, and they can be just
                           as traumatic. In a 2004 paper in Psychological Science entitled "Psychophysiolcgical Responding during Script-Driven
                           Imagery in People Reporting Abduction by Space Aliens," McNally, Clancy and their colleagues report the results of a study
                           of claimed abductees. The researchers measured heart rate, skin conductance and electromyographic responses in a muscle that
                           lifted the eyebrow—called the left lateral (outer) frontalis—of the study participants as they relived their
                           experiences through script-driven imagery. "Relative to control participants," the authors concluded, "abductees
                           exhibited greater psychophysiological reactivity to abduction and stressful scripts than to positive and neutral scripts."
                           In fact, the abductees' responses were comparable to those of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients who had listened
                           to scripts of their actual traumatic experiences.
                            
                           The abduction study was initiated as a control in a larger investigation of memories
                           of sexual abuse. In his book Remembering Trauma (Harvard University Press, 2003), McNally tracks the history
                           of the recovered memory movement of the 1990s, in which some people, while attempting to recover lost memories of childhood
                           sexual molestation (usually through hypnosis and guided imagery), instead created false memories of abuse that never happened.
                           "The fact that people who believe they have been abducted by space aliens respond like PTSD patients to audiotaped scripts
                           describing their alleged abductions," McNally explains, "underscores the power of belief to drive a physiology consistent
                           with actual traumatic experience." The vividness of a traumatic memory cannot be taken as evidence of its authenticity.
                            
                           The most likely explanation for alien abductions is sleep paralysis and hypnopompic
                           (on awakening) hallucinations. Temporary paralysis is often accompanied by visual and auditory hallucinations and sexual
                           fantasies, all of which are interpreted within the context of pop culture's fascination with UFOs and aliens. McNally
                           found that abductees "were much more prone to exhibit false recall and false recognition in the lab
                           than were control subjects," and they scored significantly higher than normal on a questionnaire measuring "absorption,"
                           a trait related to fantasy proneness that also predicts false recall[i].
                            
                           My abduction experience was triggered by sleep deprivation and physical exhaustion.
                           I had just ridden a bicycle 83 straight hours and 1,259 miles in the opening days of the 3,100-mile nonstop transcontinental
                           Race Across America. I was sleepily weaving down the road when my support motor home flashed its high beams and pulled alongside,
                           and my crew entreated me to take a sleep break. At that moment a distant memory of the 1960s television series The
                           Invaders was inculcated into my waking dream. In the series, alien beings were taking over the earth by replicating
                           actual people but, inexplicably, retained a stiff little finger. Suddenly the members of my support team were transmogrified
                           into aliens. I stared intensely at their fingers and grilled them on both technical and personal matters.
                            
                           After my 90-minute sleep break, the experience represented nothing more than a bizarre hallucination,
                           which I recounted to ABC's Wide World of Sports television crew filming the race. But at the time the experience was
                           real, and that's the point. The human capacity for self-delusion is boundless, and the effects of belief are overpowering.
                           Thanks to science we have learned to tell the difference between fantasy and reality. 
                            
                           Michael Shermer is publisher
                           of Skeptic (www.skeptic.com) and author of  The
                           Science of Good and Evil.
                            
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           [i]   Just because
                           a group of people who tell a fantastic story exhibit a proclivity to tell other such stories through the tested traits of
                           false recalls and absorption doesn’t entail that such people have a purely neurotransmitter foundation
                           for these results.  I would speculate that for some of these people have purely
                           environmental causes.  Some would, if placed in an environment which peer conditioning
                           is strongly adversive to such verbal behavior, this behavior including silent whispers would diminish over time.  However, I also suspect that others in the group would have a neurotransmitter foundation.  I base these speculations on observations I have of those who have New Age beliefs
                           and those who are extensively involved in church activities.   Some of such
                            groups are quite mentally sound, while others aren’t--jk